The purpose of this validation is two-fold.
First, it validates that efficiency computation is implemented correctly
for per.powerOrEfficiencyIsHydraulic=true
.
The results should show that
η = ηhyd ηmot
holds.
Second, it compares the power estimation results using different selections
of per.etaHydMet
.
mov1
directly uses the power curve of the fan.
mov2
uses the Euler number method to estimate
the hydraulic efficiency and computer the power consumption.
mov3
assumes a constant hydraulic efficiency
to compute the power consumption.
The three methods agree with each other when the three fans operate at different speeds under constant system condition. Their power estimates diverge when the damper closes and the system curve is changed. The Euler number method was able to produce results close to the power curves and maintained positive power consumption as the flow rate approached zero. However, the constant efficiency assumption was not able to capture this characteristic.