Description
In this examples are compared three PID controllers:
- Continuous time PID with two degrees of freedom
(model PID (with Ts=0) ),
- the discretised version of the continuous time PID with two degrees of freedom
(model PID ),
- and the digital implementation of the PID with two degrees of freedom in the incremental form
(model PID_2dof ).
There controllers regulates a second order process with trasfer function
Y(s) (1+15s)
---- = ----------------
U(s) (1+10s)(1+2s)
The following images show the SetPoint following and disturbance rejection without saturation
Set Point and Process Variables
Control Signals
To be noticed that the discretised version of the PID and the digital implementation of the incremental PID have
the same behaviour.
The same is not valid when the saturation is introduced. If limiting the controller action between [0,2] the
discrete time version and the digital one behave quite differently
Set Point and Process Variables
Control Signals
This difference is due to the nature of the digital implementation that is incremental, while the other two are
positional.
This problem does not appear if the Set Point reference changes soothly, switching to a ramp Set Point signal,
as shown in the following picture.
Process Variables and Control Signals with a ramp Set Point
- Industrial Control Systems (v 1.0.0) : April-May 2012
- List of revisions:
- 11 May 2012 (author: Marco Bonvini)
- Main Authors:
- Marco Bonvini; <bonvini@elet.polimi.it>
- Alberto Leva <leva@elet.polimi.it>
- Politecnico di Milano
- Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione
- Via Ponzio 34/5
- 20133 Milano - ITALIA -
- Copyright:
- Copyright © 2010-2012, Marco Bonvini and Alberto Leva.
- The IndustrialControlSystems package is free software; it can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms of the Modelica license.
Generated at 2024-12-17T19:26:02Z
by OpenModelicaOpenModelica 1.24.3 using GenerateDoc.mos